Cost-effectiveness of telbivudine versus lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic hepatitis B is a highly prevalent disease worldwide, leading to serious consequences if not properly treated. Six treatment options for chronic hepatitis B are currently provided by the Brazilian public health system. Telbivudine is a nucleoside analogue that is neither included in the Brazilian clinical protocol nor in the therapeutic guidelines for chronic hepatitis B. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of telbivudine for the viewpoint of the Brazilian public system, comparing it to lamivudine. METHODS: A Markov model was used to project lifetime complications and costs of treatment with lamivudine or telbivudine for chronic hepatitis B in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. To evaluate disease progression, probabilities and utilities of virologic response, virologic resistance, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, treatment, interruption of treatment, death and seroconversion were collected in systematic reviews. Costs were collected in DATASUS, ABC da Saúde and scientific literature. RESULTS: Higher rate of virologic response and seroconversion was obtained with telbivudine, and also higher values of quality adjusted life years. However lamivudine is associated with lower costs and also lower cost-effectiveness values. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for telbivudine, when compared with lamivudine, were US$ 30,575 and US$ 40,457, respectively for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSION: In chronic hepatitis B lamivudine is a more cost-effective or even cost-saving strategy when compared with telbivudine.

The cost-effectiveness analysis of initiating HIV/AIDS treatment with efavirenz-based regimens compared with nevirapine-based regimens in Thailand.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-utility of the treatment, starting with EFZ-based therapy, compared with NVP-based therapy in Thai HIV/AIDS patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study adopted a health care provider perspective. A probabilistic Markov model was applied to Thai HIV/AIDS patients aged 15 to 65 years. Input parameters were extracted from a cohort study of four regional hospitals. The study explored the effects of uncertainty around input parameters. RESULTS: For those patients with a different baseline CD4, initial therapy using EFZ-based regimens was the preferable choice for all subgroups. Given a maximum acceptable willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of 300,000 Baht/DALY averted starting with EFZ-based regimens was cost-effective for patients with a baseline CD4 count less than 250 cells/mm3 and in all patient age groups, except those who were 20 years old. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that starting with EFZ-based regimens was the preferable choice and it should be used as the first line regimen for Thai HIV/AIDS patients.